Public Goods
This section explains Public Goods covering, the Distinction Between Public and Private Goods, Why Public Goods May Not Be Provided by the Private Sector and The Free Rider Problem.
Distinction Between Public and Private Goods
In economics, public goods and private goods are distinguished based on two key characteristics: non-rivalry and non-excludability. These concepts explain why certain goods are not efficiently provided by the market without government intervention.
Public Goods:
Public goods are defined by two key characteristics:
- Non-Rivalry: This means that one person’s consumption of the good does not reduce its availability for others. For example, if one person benefits from street lighting, this does not reduce the amount of light available to others. The good can be consumed simultaneously by many people without diminishing the quality or quantity of the good.
- Non-Excludability: This means that it is impossible, or very costly, to prevent individuals from using the good, even if they do not pay for it. For example, once national defence is provided, everyone in the country benefits from it, regardless of whether they contributed to funding it.
Example of Public Goods:
- National Defence: Once national defence is provided, it protects everyone within a country, whether or not they contribute to paying for it.
- Street Lighting: Once street lights are installed, all members of the public benefit from the lighting, regardless of whether they personally contributed to its cost.
Private Goods:
Private goods, in contrast, are characterised by:
- Rivalry: If one person consumes the good, it reduces the availability of the good for others. For example, if one person buys a loaf of bread, that loaf is no longer available for someone else.
- Excludability: It is possible to prevent individuals from consuming the good unless they pay for it. For example, only those who pay for a cinema ticket can watch the film.
Example of Private Goods:
- Bread: A loaf of bread can only be consumed by the person who buys it. If someone buys it, others cannot access that same loaf.
- Cinema Tickets: Only those who purchase a ticket can watch the film; others are excluded.
Key Distinction Table:
| Characteristic | Public Goods | Private Goods |
|---|---|---|
| Rivalry | Non-rivalrous (one person’s consumption doesn’t reduce availability) | Rivalrous (one person’s consumption reduces availability) |
| Excludability | Non-excludable (cannot exclude individuals from using the good) | Excludable (can exclude non-payers) |
2. Why Public Goods May Not Be Provided by the Private Sector: The Free Rider Problem
The free rider problem is a key reason why public goods are often not provided efficiently by the private sector. It arises because of the non-excludability characteristic of public goods. If individuals can benefit from a good without paying for it, they have little incentive to contribute to the cost of providing the good. This leads to under-provision of the good in the market, as firms are unable to charge consumers directly for their use.
The Free Rider Problem:
- Individuals or firms who do not pay for the good can still enjoy its benefits. This encourages people to "free ride" on the contributions of others, avoiding payment while still enjoying the benefits.
Example:
- National Defence: People in a country are protected by national defence whether or not they contribute to funding it through taxes. This means there is no direct financial incentive for individuals to voluntarily pay for national defence, leading to a situation where the government must step in to provide the service.
- Street Lighting: Once street lights are installed in a neighbourhood, everyone benefits from the light, even those who do not contribute to the cost of installing or maintaining the lights. As a result, private companies have little incentive to provide such a good.
Consequences of the Free Rider Problem:
- Under-Provision of Public Goods: Since private firms cannot exclude non-payers from using the good, they may not find it profitable to provide the good in the first place, resulting in an under-supply of the good.
- Inefficiency: The market fails to provide enough of the good, which results in a welfare loss. Society is left without a good that would have been beneficial to everyone.
How Governments Address the Free Rider Problem:
To overcome the free rider problem, governments typically intervene and provide public goods directly. Since the government can tax individuals, it can fund the provision of public goods without relying on voluntary payments. The government can then ensure that everyone receives the benefits, even if they do not contribute financially.
Example of Government Provision:
- Public Goods like National Defence: The government collects taxes from individuals and businesses to fund national defence. Since people cannot opt out of paying for it, the government can ensure that the good is provided to everyone, overcoming the free rider problem.
- Public Health (e.g., the NHS): The government funds the NHS through taxation, ensuring that healthcare is provided to all citizens, even those who might not be able to afford it otherwise.
Summary of Key Points:
| Concept | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Public Goods | Goods that are non-rivalrous and non-excludable (e.g., national defence, street lighting). |
| Private Goods | Goods that are rivalrous and excludable (e.g., bread, cinema tickets). |
| Free Rider Problem | Occurs when people benefit from a good without paying for it, leading to under-provision in the private market. |
| Government Intervention | Governments provide public goods directly (e.g., taxation for national defence, street lighting) to overcome the free rider problem. |
Summary
Understanding the distinction between public goods and private goods is crucial in economics, particularly in the context of market failure. The non-rivalry and non-excludability characteristics of public goods explain why they are often not provided efficiently by the private sector. The free rider problem results in the under-provision of these goods, as private firms cannot exclude non-payers, leading to a market failure. In such cases, government intervention is necessary to ensure the provision of public goods for the benefit of society.
Category
