Development of Castles

This section explains the development of castles under the Normans and describes the Development of Tamworth Castle and The Tower of London.  Tamworth Castle, located in Staffordshire, is an important example of how Norman fortifications evolved after the Conquest of England in 1066. Originally, the site had been a Saxon burh, a fortified settlement built to defend against Viking raids. However, following the Norman invasion, the Normans established their own castle on the site in 1070 to assert their control over the area. This was the beginning of Tamworth Castle's transformation from a Saxon stronghold into a Norman fortification.

By the 1080s, the original wooden structure was replaced with a more permanent stone keep. This shift from wood to stone represented a broader trend across England, as the Normans increasingly favoured stone castles over the earlier wooden motte and bailey designs.

Advantages of Stone Castles Over Wooden Motte and Bailey Castles

The introduction of stone keeps brought several key advantages that made them a preferred choice over wooden motte and bailey castles:

• Construction While Operational: One significant advantage of building a stone keep was that it could be constructed inside the walls of the existing wooden motte and bailey structure. This meant that the castle could remain operational while the stone keep was being built. The defenders could continue to use the wooden fortifications for protection during construction, and once the stone keep was completed, they could move into the more secure structure.
• Durability: Stone keeps were far more durable than their wooden counterparts. Wooden motte and bailey castles were prone to decay, especially in the damp British climate, and could be destroyed by fire. In contrast, stone keeps could withstand the weather, wear and tear, and were far less susceptible to fire. This made stone castles a better long-term investment, particularly as Norman lords sought to consolidate their power in England.
• Symbol of Wealth and Power: Constructing a stone castle was a costly endeavour, requiring skilled labour and significant resources. Only the wealthiest lords could afford to build such fortifications. As a result, stone castles became symbols of the wealth, status, and military power of the lord who built them. The size and grandeur of a stone castle reinforced the authority of the lord and served as a visible reminder of Norman dominance in the area.

The First Stone Castle: The Tower of London

The first major stone tower built in England after the Norman Conquest was commissioned by William I in 1070. Known today as the Tower of London, this was an important symbol of Norman authority. The construction of the Tower marked the beginning of a widespread trend in the building of stone castles across England. Between 1070 and 1087, more than 85 stone castles were constructed, cementing Norman control over the country and demonstrating their military and architectural prowess.

Image

Key Features of Stone Castles

The most prominent feature of these stone castles was the central stone tower, or keep. The keep was typically built at the highest point of the castle, often atop a motte or artificial mound, to maximise its visibility and defensive advantages.

• Visibility and Symbolism: The height of the stone keep allowed it to be seen from miles around, serving as a visible symbol of Norman power. For the local population, the presence of such a castle was a constant reminder of their subjugation to Norman rule. The keep's visibility also gave defenders a strategic advantage, allowing them to spot any approaching attackers from a great distance.
• Defensive Strength: The height of the keep provided excellent positions for lookouts and archers. The elevated position allowed archers to fire down on any attackers, making it much more difficult for enemies to approach the castle undetected. In addition, the high vantage point made it easier to spot potential threats, allowing the defenders to prepare and respond quickly.
• Comfort and Luxury for the Lord: The stone keep provided a much more comfortable living space for the lord and his family compared to the earlier wooden structures. The thick stone walls provided insulation, allowing the keep to remain warmer in winter and cooler in summer. The risk of fire, which was a significant problem with wooden keeps, was also reduced. Inside, the lord and his household could enjoy greater luxury, with larger living quarters and better protection from the elements.
• Lasting Defences: The stone keep was designed to be the last part of the castle to fall in the event of a siege. The keep was the stronghold where the lord and his soldiers could take refuge if the outer defences were breached. It was built to withstand long sieges, allowing the defenders to survive for months if necessary while they awaited reinforcements.

Weaknesses of Stone Keeps

While stone keeps were much stronger and more durable than wooden structures, they were not invulnerable. Over time, attackers learned to exploit some of the weaknesses of these castles:

• High Cost and Maintenance: One of the primary drawbacks of stone castles was their cost. Building a stone castle was an expensive undertaking, and maintaining such a structure required significant resources. Only the wealthiest lords could afford to build and maintain a secure stone castle. For many smaller lords, this made stone castles an impractical option, and they relied on smaller, less expensive fortifications instead.
• Vulnerability to Mining: Most stone castles were built on a square or rectangular plan, which created a weakness at the corners of the castle. Attackers could dig tunnels, or "mine", underneath the castle's walls. By digging under the corners, they could weaken the foundations and cause sections of the castle to collapse. Mining was a common siege tactic used to undermine the strength of stone fortifications.
• Siege Weapons: Stone castles were also vulnerable to siege weapons like the trebuchet, a type of large catapult that could launch heavy stones or other projectiles. If these missiles struck the flat surfaces of the castle's walls, they could cause significant damage. Over time, the Normans and other medieval powers developed stronger defences, but the threat of siege weapons remained a challenge for castle builders.

Examples of Other Notable Stone Castles

• Durham Castle: Another example of a stone castle built during the Norman period is Durham Castle in the northeast of England. Built in the late 11th century, Durham Castle combines both Norman and later medieval architectural styles. It was built as a fortress for the Bishop of Durham, demonstrating the dual role of castles as both military fortifications and centres of administration.
• Windsor Castle: Windsor Castle, initially founded by William the Conqueror in the 11th century, is another iconic example of Norman castle design. The original motte and bailey structure was later replaced with a stone keep, and the castle grew into a symbol of royal power. Today, Windsor Castle is one of the oldest and most famous castles in the world and is still inhabited by the current British Royal family.

Conclusion

The development of stone castles, exemplified by sites like Tamworth Castle, represented a significant advancement in military architecture during the Norman period. While these castles offered greater durability, luxury, and defensive strength than their wooden predecessors, they were not without their vulnerabilities. The cost of construction and maintenance, along with the growing effectiveness of siege weapons and mining techniques, meant that stone castles could still be defeated under the right conditions. Nevertheless, stone keeps remained the most powerful symbols of Norman authority in medieval England and continued to evolve throughout the Middle Ages.